Typology Of The International Judicial Act

Journal Issue:

Author : 
Author Information: 

Doctor of Philosophy (Law), Associate Professor of International Law and Law of the International Economic Relations at the Moldavian State University


In the present article results of the complex and comprehensive research devoted to the multilateral research of the international judicial act typology are presented. In the course of the research, conducted by the author, classification criteria of the various categories of judicial acts are marked out. For the detailed representation of the set of existing international judicial acts, a significant amount of concrete acts were used, made by the international judicial instances in the course of legal proceedings and norms of the international common and conventional law application were used. A separate attention in the article was paid by the author to the acts made by the UN International Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. In the conclusion author emphasizes that without and even contrary to the existing variety of international judicial acts, and also a set of criteria for their classification, carried-out analysis of acts has rather theoretical than practical value for application. After all, despite the name or specifics of the resolved question, the main feature of the act belongs to its binding character for parties of the international process. And practical introduction of instructions in the text of the act has a direct impact on the established world law and order, touches issues of the international law norms application.


international judicial act, resolution, decision, sentence, International Court of Justice, European Court of Human Rights, UN, ECHR.


[1] Abashidze A.X., Solncev A.M. Mirnoe razreshenie mezhdunarodnyx sporov: sovremennye problemy. 2-e izd. Monografiya - M: RUDN, 2012.
[2] Gaagskaya Konvenciya o mirnom reshenii mezhdunarodnyx stolknovenij ot 18 oktyabrya 1907 g.// URL: http://ppt.ru/texts/index.phtml?id=32048 (data obrashheniya 27 iyulya 2013 g.).
[2] Evropejskaya Konvenciya o zashhite Prav Cheloveka i Osnovnyx Svobod ot 04 noyabrya 1950 g. //URL: http://echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_RUS.pdf (data obrashheniya 27 iyulya 2013 g.).
[3] Reglament Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON. Sud OON. 14 aprelya 1978 g.// URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/ru/icjrules.php /
[4] Reglament Evropejskogo Suda po Pravam Cheloveka («Rules of the European Court of Human Rights»). Evropejskij Sud po Pravam Cheloveka. 01 iyulya 2013 g.// URL: http://echr.coe.int/Documents/Rules_Court_ENG.pdf /
[5] Rimskij Statut Mezhdunarodnogo Ugolovnogo Suda. 17 iyulya 1998 g.// URL: http://www.un.org/ru/law/icc/rome_statute(r).pdf
[6] Statut Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON. 24 oktyabrya 1945 g. Sud OON. //URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/homepage/ru/icjstatute.php
[7] Ustav OON. 24 oktyabrya 1945 g. // URL: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/charter/
[8] Case concerning the land, maritime and frontier dispute (El Salvador v. Honduras). Judgment. September 13, 1990. ICJ. //URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/75/6657.pdf
[9] Case concerning the land and maritime boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v.Nigeria). Shhkvukyu Shhseshhiuk 21b 1999yu ShSOyu GKDZh reezZh..cccyushso-sshoyushhkp.vshhslue.ashduy.94.7449yuzva
[10] Case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo). Judgment. June 19, 2012. ICJ. //URL: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/103/17045.pdf
[11] Case concerning Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo). Ogvputeyu Tshhmuiuk 30b 2010yu ShSOyu reezZh..cccyushso-sshoyushhkp.vshhslue.ashduy.103.16245yuzva
[12] Combacau J., Sur S. Droit international public. Paris: Montchrestien, 1997.
[13] Eudes M. La pratique judiciaire interne de la Cour Européenne des Droits de l’Homme. Paris: A. Pedone, 2005.
[14] The Corfu Channel case (The United Kingdom v. Albania). Judgment. April 9, 1949. ICJ. // URL:http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/1/1644.pdf